The iPhone seems to do its best work when it has a lot of natural light (but so does every other camera). Those are pretty similar, at least at this small size.
Here’s a tree across the street from my house. (This is also just a good general example of the difference between f/2.8 and f/6.3.) To compare more closely, here’s a shot from the Canon at f/6.3. You’re probably thinking, “that’s not fair! You’re shooting at, like, f/2.8, but the iPhone doesn’t let you set the depth of field.” True, but that’s a benefit of an SLR. The Canon (this is the closest I could frame the shot, since this is not a macro lens – but there’s no denying that the color is truer, and the shot much more detailed - and this is not even comparing full-size crops): I predict: AWESOMETASTIC.) iPhone 5:Īnd the same cookies, shot with the Canon:Īnother angle of the cookies - more of a macro shot. (That top cookie, the “junk food cookie,” contains pretzels, chocolate chips, peanut butter cups, and Cheez-Its. Here are some cookies that I got from a local bakery today. Also, keep in mind that these are all JPG files resized for web viewing, so we’re not comparing a 2.38MB iPhone JPG with a 26MB Canon RAW. (Processed RAW images would have more color depth, and better white balance, among other differences.) The trickiest thing was to produce similar framing between the cameras, with the iPhone having a different height-to-width ratio, and seeming to adjust its perceived focal length on the fly. The Canon’s shots are from the JPG files, not the RAW files.
To make this as fair as possible, I didn’t post-process the images. (“Top o’ da mornin’, guvnah!” I’m afraid it’s even more embarrassing in person.) But even if it’s silly… let’s compare! I like to be silly – like when I talk in my cockney accent. The other is a dedicated professional-level camera. In a word: WTF? (Is that one word or three?) The Canon 5D III ($3459) with the 24-70mm f/2.8 L II ($2299 – assuming you can find one in stock anywhere) = $5758. With a contract, though, you can get the 16GB model for $199. A 64GB iPhone 5, out of contract, costs $849. This body + lens combo weighs 58.7 ounces - more than 3.5 pounds. Is it worth hauling it around when I go on a trip, if I could just use the iPhone? “Hauling” is precisely what the Canon demands. My current go-to lens is the new Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L II. Just about every picture I post on the blog comes from my DSLR - currently the Canon 5D Mark III. The iPhone’s camera gets better with every generation, but can it replace an SLR yet? There have definitely been times that I wanted to take a picture of something and only had my iPhone with me, and it’s obviously better to have gotten the picture with something. Jarvis Brownlee had a 70-yard interception return for a touchdown, and Jammie Robinson had an interception in the end zone.Chase Jarvis said the famous words, “The best camera is the one that’s with you.” The iPhone has become the most popular camera on Flickr, because there are like a hundred million billion iPhones, and it takes a very good picture. The Seminoles also grabbed two interceptions. It’s a bunch of guys that love each other. It’s a team game and we’re a team for once. Guys like seeing other guys making plays. “It just shows what type of team we’re becoming,” Travis said. Florida State’s starters erupted in celebration on the sideline. With mostly backups in the game, redshirt freshman quarterback Chubba Purdy completed touchdown passes to Camren McDonald in the third quarter and Jordan Young in the fourth quarter. Travis ran for 78 yards on nine carries despite playing just a drive after halftime.įlorida State ran for a season-high 365 yards, the sixth time this season the Seminoles have surpassed the 200-yard mark on the ground. Corbin ran for 127 yards on 11 carries, his fourth 100-yard rushing game this season.
0 kommentar(er)
